struct InLoop {
        int iCur;              /* The VDBE cursor used by this IN operator */
        int addrInTop;         /* Top of the IN loop */
      } *aInLoop;           /* Information about each nested IN operator */
    } in;                 /* Used when plan.wsFlags&WHERE_IN_ABLE */
    Index *pCovidx;       /* Possible covering index for WHERE_MULTI_OR */
  } u;
  double rOptCost;      /* "Optimal" cost for this level */

  /* The following field is really not part of the current level.  But
  ** we need a place to cache virtual table index information for each
  ** virtual table in the FROM clause and the WhereLevel structure is
  ** a convenient place since there is one WhereLevel for each FROM clause
  ** element.
  */

        assert( sWBI.pSrc->pIndex==0 
                  || (sWBI.cost.plan.wsFlags & WHERE_NOT_FULLSCAN)==0
                  || sWBI.cost.plan.u.pIdx==sWBI.pSrc->pIndex );

        if( isOptimal && (sWBI.cost.plan.wsFlags & WHERE_NOT_FULLSCAN)==0 ){
          notIndexed |= m;
        }
        if( isOptimal ){
          pWInfo->a[j].rOptCost = sWBI.cost.rCost;
        }else if( iFrom<nTabList-1 ){
          /* If two or more tables have nearly the same outer loop cost,
          ** very different inner loop (optimal) cost, we want to choose
          ** for the outer loop that table which benefits the least from
          ** being in the inner loop.  The following code scales the 
          ** outer loop cost estimate to accomplish that. */
          WHERETRACE(("   scaling cost from %.1f to %.1f\n",
                      sWBI.cost.rCost,
                      sWBI.cost.rCost/pWInfo->a[j].rOptCost));
          sWBI.cost.rCost /= pWInfo->a[j].rOptCost;
        }

        /* Conditions under which this table becomes the best so far:
        **
        **   (1) The table must not depend on other tables that have not
        **       yet run.  (In other words, it must not depend on tables
        **       in inner loops.)
        **
        **   (2) A full-table-scan plan cannot supercede indexed plan unless
        **       the full-table-scan is an "optimal" plan as defined above.
        **   (2) (This rule was removed on 2012-11-09.  The scaling of the
        **       cost using the optimal scan cost made this rule obsolete.)
        **
        **   (3) All tables have an INDEXED BY clause or this table lacks an
        **       INDEXED BY clause or this table uses the specific
        **       index specified by its INDEXED BY clause.  This rule ensures
        **       that a best-so-far is always selected even if an impossible
        **       combination of INDEXED BY clauses are given.  The error
        **       will be detected and relayed back to the application later.
        **       The NEVER() comes about because rule (2) above prevents
        **       An indexable full-table-scan from reaching rule (3).
        **
        **   (4) The plan cost must be lower than prior plans, where "cost"
        **       is defined by the compareCost() function above. 
        */
        if( (sWBI.cost.used&sWBI.notValid)==0                    /* (1) */
            && (bestJ<0 || (notIndexed&m)!=0                     /* (2) */
                || (bestPlan.plan.wsFlags & WHERE_NOT_FULLSCAN)==0
                || (sWBI.cost.plan.wsFlags & WHERE_NOT_FULLSCAN)!=0)
            && (nUnconstrained==0 || sWBI.pSrc->pIndex==0        /* (3) */
                || NEVER((sWBI.cost.plan.wsFlags & WHERE_NOT_FULLSCAN)!=0))
            && (bestJ<0 || compareCost(&sWBI.cost, &bestPlan))   /* (4) */
        ){
          WHERETRACE(("   === table %d (%s) is best so far\n"
                      "       cost=%.1f, nRow=%.1f, nOBSat=%d, wsFlags=%08x\n",
                      j, sWBI.pSrc->pTab->zName,

        (NULL, 2, 1, 'two-a'),
        (NULL, 3, 1, 'three-a');
    COMMIT;
  }
} {}
do_test 1.1a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}

# Verify that the ORDER BY clause is optimized out
#
do_test 1.1b {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY optimized out

# The same query with ORDER BY clause optimization disabled via + operators
# should give exactly the same answer.
#
do_test 1.2a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
  }
} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}

# The output is sorted manually in this case.
#
do_test 1.2b {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
  }
} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to "+" on ORDER BY terms

# The same query with ORDER BY optimizations turned off via built-in test.
#
do_test 1.3a {
  optimization_control db order-by-idx-join 0
  db cache flush
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
do_test 1.3b {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to disabled optimization
optimization_control db all 1
db cache flush

# Reverse order sorts
#
do_test 1.4a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
  }
} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}
do_test 1.4b {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn
  }
} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}  ;# verify same order after sorting
do_test 1.4c {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# optimized out


do_test 1.5a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
  }
} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}
do_test 1.5b {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
  }
} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
do_test 1.5c {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# optimized out

do_test 1.6a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
  }
} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}
do_test 1.6b {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn DESC
  }
} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
do_test 1.6c {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY optimized-out


# Reconstruct the test data to use indices rather than integer primary keys.
#
do_test 2.0 {

        (20, 1, 'two-a'),
        (3,  1, 'three-a');
    COMMIT;
  }
} {}
do_test 2.1a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}

# Verify that the ORDER BY clause is optimized out
#
do_test 2.1b {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY optimized out

do_test 2.1c {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, aid, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, aid, tn
  }
} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
do_test 2.1d {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, aid, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, aid, tn
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY optimized out

# The same query with ORDER BY clause optimization disabled via + operators
# should give exactly the same answer.
#
do_test 2.2a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
  }
} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}

# The output is sorted manually in this case.
#
do_test 2.2b {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
  }
} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to "+" on ORDER BY terms

# The same query with ORDER BY optimizations turned off via built-in test.
#
do_test 2.3a {
  optimization_control db order-by-idx-join 0
  db cache flush
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
do_test 2.3b {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to disabled optimization
optimization_control db all 1
db cache flush

# Reverse order sorts
#
do_test 2.4a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
  }
} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}
do_test 2.4b {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn
  }
} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}  ;# verify same order after sorting
do_test 2.4c {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# optimized out


do_test 2.5a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
  }
} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}
do_test 2.5b {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
  }
} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
do_test 2.5c {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# optimized out

do_test 2.6a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
  }
} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}
do_test 2.6b {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn DESC
  }
} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
do_test 2.6c {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY optimized out


# Generate another test dataset, but this time using mixed ASC/DESC indices.
#
do_test 3.0 {

        (NULL, 2, 1, 'two-a'),
        (NULL, 3, 1, 'three-a');
    COMMIT;
  }
} {}
do_test 3.1a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
  }
} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}

# Verify that the ORDER BY clause is optimized out
#
do_test 3.1b {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY optimized out

# The same query with ORDER BY clause optimization disabled via + operators
# should give exactly the same answer.
#
do_test 3.2a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
  }
} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}

# The output is sorted manually in this case.
#
do_test 3.2b {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
  }
} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to "+" on ORDER BY terms

# The same query with ORDER BY optimizations turned off via built-in test.
#
do_test 3.3a {
  optimization_control db order-by-idx-join 0
  db cache flush
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
  }
} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}
do_test 3.3b {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
  }
} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to disabled optimization
optimization_control db all 1
db cache flush

# Without the mixed ASC/DESC on ORDER BY
#
do_test 3.4a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
do_test 3.4b {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
  }
} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}  ;# verify same order after sorting
do_test 3.4c {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# optimized out


do_test 3.5a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
  }
} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}
do_test 3.5b {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn DESC
  }
} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
do_test 3.5c {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# optimzed out


do_test 3.6a {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
  }
} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}
do_test 3.6b {
  db eval {
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn
  }
} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}  ;# verify same order after sorting
do_test 3.6c {
  db eval {
    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
  }
} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# inverted ASC/DESC is optimized out


finish_test

# 2012 November 9
#
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
#
#    May you do good and not evil.
#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
# focus of this file is testing the query planner to make sure it
# is making good planning decisions.
#


set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl
set ::testprefix whereE

do_execsql_test 1.1 {
  CREATE TABLE t1(a,b);
  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,10), (2,20), (3,30), (2,22), (3, 33);
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1;
  ALTER TABLE t1 ADD COLUMN c;
  UPDATE t1 SET c=a*rowid+10000;
  CREATE INDEX t1ab ON t1(a,b);
  
  CREATE TABLE t2(x,y);
  INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4,44),(5,55),(6,66),(7,77);
  INSERT INTO t2 SELECT x+4, (x+4)*11 FROM t2;
  INSERT INTO t2 SELECT x+8, (x+8)*11 FROM t2;
  INSERT INTO t2 SELECT x+16, (x+16)*11 FROM t2;
  INSERT INTO t2 SELECT x+32, (x+32)*11 FROM t2;
  INSERT INTO t2 SELECT x+64, (x+32)*11 FROM t2;
  ALTER TABLE t2 ADD COLUMN z;
  UPDATE t2 SET z=2;
  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t2zx ON t2(z,x);

  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT x FROM t1, t2 WHERE a=z AND c=x;
} {/.*SCAN TABLE t1 .*SEARCH TABLE t2 .*/}
do_execsql_test 1.2 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT x FROM t2, t1 WHERE a=z AND c=x;
} {/.*SCAN TABLE t1 .*SEARCH TABLE t2 .*/}
do_execsql_test 1.3 {
  ANALYZE;
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT x FROM t1, t2 WHERE a=z AND c=x;
} {/.*SCAN TABLE t1 .*SEARCH TABLE t2 .*/}
do_execsql_test 1.4 {
  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT x FROM t2, t1 WHERE a=z AND c=x;
} {/.*SCAN TABLE t1 .*SEARCH TABLE t2 .*/}

finish_test

# 2012 November 9
#
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
#
#    May you do good and not evil.
#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
# 
# Test cases for query planning decisions.


#
# The tests in this file demonstrate the behaviour of the query planner
# in determining the order in which joined tables are scanned.
#
# Assume there are two tables being joined - t1 and t2. Each has a cost
# if it is the outer loop, and a cost if it is the inner loop. As follows:
#
#   t1(outer) - cost of scanning t1 as the outer loop.
#   t1(inner) - cost of scanning t1 as the inner loop.
#   t2(outer) - cost of scanning t2 as the outer loop.
#   t2(inner) - cost of scanning t2 as the inner loop.
#
# Depending on the order in which the planner nests the scans, the total
# cost of the join query is one of:
#
#   t1(outer) * t2(inner)
#   t2(outer) * t1(inner)
#
# The tests in this file attempt to verify that the planner nests joins in
# the correct order when the following are true:
#
#   + (t1(outer) * t2(inner)) > (t1(inner) * t2(outer)
#   +  t1(outer) < t2(outer)
#
# In other words, when the best overall query plan has t2 as the outer loop,
# but when the outer loop is considered independent of the inner, t1 is the
# most efficient choice.
#
# In order to make them more predictable, automatic indexes are turned off for
# the tests in this file.
#

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl
set testprefix x

do_execsql_test 1.0 {
  PRAGMA automatic_index = 0;
  CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
  CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f);
  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX i1 ON t1(a);
  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX i2 ON t2(d);
} {}

foreach {tn sql} {
  1 "SELECT * FROM t1,           t2 WHERE t1.a=t2.e AND t2.d<t1.b AND t1.c!=10"
  2 "SELECT * FROM t2,           t1 WHERE t1.a=t2.e AND t2.d<t1.b AND t1.c!=10"
  3 "SELECT * FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t1.a=t2.e AND t2.d<t1.b AND t1.c!=10"
} {
  do_test 1.$tn {
    db eval "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN $sql"
   } {/.*SCAN TABLE t2 .*SEARCH TABLE t1 .*/}
}

do_execsql_test 2.0 {
  DROP TABLE t1;
  DROP TABLE t2;
  CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
  CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f);

  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX i1 ON t1(a);
  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX i2 ON t1(b);
  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX i3 ON t2(d);
} {}

foreach {tn sql} {
  1 "SELECT * FROM t1,           t2 WHERE t1.a>? AND t2.d>t1.c AND t1.b=t2.e"
  2 "SELECT * FROM t2,           t1 WHERE t1.a>? AND t2.d>t1.c AND t1.b=t2.e"
  3 "SELECT * FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t1.a>? AND t2.d>t1.c AND t1.b=t2.e"
} {
  do_test 2.$tn {
    db eval "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN $sql"
   } {/.*SCAN TABLE t2 .*SEARCH TABLE t1 .*/}
}

do_execsql_test 3.0 {
  DROP TABLE t1;
  DROP TABLE t2;
  CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
  CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f);

  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX i1 ON t1(a, b);
  CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d);
} {}

foreach {tn sql} {
  1 {SELECT t1.a, t1.b, t2.d, t2.e FROM t1, t2 
     WHERE t2.d=t1.b AND t1.a=(t2.d+1) AND t1.b = (t2.e+1)}

  2 {SELECT t1.a, t1.b, t2.d, t2.e FROM t2, t1 
     WHERE t2.d=t1.b AND t1.a=(t2.d+1) AND t1.b = (t2.e+1)}

  3 {SELECT t1.a, t1.b, t2.d, t2.e FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 
     WHERE t2.d=t1.b AND t1.a=(t2.d+1) AND t1.b = (t2.e+1)}
} {
  do_test 3.$tn {
    db eval "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN $sql"
   } {/.*SCAN TABLE t2 .*SEARCH TABLE t1 .*/}
}

finish_test