Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
7 check-ins related to "IN-with-ORDERBY"
|
2013-02-13
| ||
| 01:00 | Allow an index to be used for sorting even if prior terms of the index are constrained by IN operators. (check-in: 2cef8b68f0 user: drh tags: trunk) | |
|
2013-02-08
| ||
| 23:18 | Fix a potential NULL-pointer dereference following an OOM error in the query planner logic for virtual tables with OR-connected terms. (Closed-Leaf check-in: 71b6c26053 user: drh tags: IN-with-ORDERBY) | |
| 20:39 | Make sure the virtual tables that take advantage of IN operators sort the RHS of the IN operator in the correct order according to the ORDER BY clause. (check-in: b016b7546d user: drh tags: IN-with-ORDERBY) | |
| 18:48 | Loop through the elements on the RHS of an IN operator in reverse order when the ORDER BY clauses specifies DESC. (check-in: f78395c889 user: drh tags: IN-with-ORDERBY) | |
| 16:04 | Allow the "a=?1 OR a=?2" to "a IN (?1,?2)" transformation to work on virtual tables again. This was formerly restricted because virtual tables could not optimize IN terms. (See check-in [fad88e71cf195e].) But IN terms are now used by virtual tables (as of check-in [3d65c70343]) so the restriction can now be removed. (check-in: a917c1f092 user: drh tags: IN-with-ORDERBY) | |
|
2013-02-07
| ||
| 21:15 | Allow an index to be used for sorting even if prior terms of the index are constrained by IN operators. (check-in: 98bf668ab1 user: drh tags: IN-with-ORDERBY) | |
| 09:33 | Fix harmless compiler warnings. (check-in: 4a7b4ee011 user: drh tags: trunk) | |